- Parallels desktop vs vmware fusion mac os#
- Parallels desktop vs vmware fusion install#
- Parallels desktop vs vmware fusion software#
- Parallels desktop vs vmware fusion windows 7#
The freeware alternative offers similar functionality, but requires a little more configuration, and refused to recognize an external hard drive in our test. The absence of drag-and-drop between the guest and host is already almost a good enough reason to opt for one of the commercial programs, although the shared folders are still available.Ī decision for or against any one of the solutions can't be made thus far though, both of the commercial solutions make a tried-and-tested impression and have all the required functionality. With a USB stick in contrast this was possible without any problems. It was not possible to connect the USB hard drive, which contained some of the test games and benchmarks, to the VM in our test though. The configuration options for the simulated hardware are available as they are with both of the other solutions, and can all be set in a somewhat convoluted menu structure. VirtualBox 4 showed itself to be a bit more of an outsider in this case. The disconnecting and connecting of the devices while the VM is running is possible the same way as with a normal PC. can be set using the user interface of the programs very easily, and all the connected devices can be attached to the VM's different programs at will. The administration of virtual hard drives, the network, and RAM, as well as the number of available processor cores etc. Printers don't have to be installed in the guest operating system separately, but can be inherited from the host system.
Parallels desktop vs vmware fusion mac os#
In detail Parallels Desktop 6 offers more configuration options in some areas than VMware Fusion 3.1.īoth of the solutions share a clipboard with Mac OS and allow the exchange of files via "shared folders" as well as drag-and-drop. This impression is due to the very similar user guidance.
Parallels desktop vs vmware fusion install#
Finally install the "Guest Additions" so that the drivers are available those that also want to install 3D support will have to start the VM again, and boot into Windows Safe Mode using F8, before the installation of drivers can begin.Īt first glance both of the commercial solutions appear to be very similar.
Parallels desktop vs vmware fusion windows 7#
Then during the first attempt to install Windows 7 we were confronted with the disenchantment: The external USB hard drive wasn't recognized, so the installation had to be carried out from the internal Mac DVD drive - 41 minutes. With the third candidate, VirtualBox 4, the installation completed very quickly - with an 80 MB download size, this is the "smallest" candidate in our test. The procedure is the same as with Parallels Desktop 6 - via the menu the installation hard drive can be virtually connected, and the setup starts automatically. In this case VMware Tools should be installed in the virtual machine after the installation for better support.
Parallels desktop vs vmware fusion software#
The software is quickly installed and ready to use.
Similar behavior showed itself with VMware Fusion 3.1. Via a menu entry the installation USB hard drive can be connected for the Tools. Following this came the installation of the so called "Parallels Tools", which is necessary to provide Windows with the drivers for the virtualized hardware components. The installation from the USB hard drive completed without any problems - after 18 minutes the login screen for Windows 7 appeared for the first time.
After this we installed Windows as a VM straight away. The installation of Parallels Desktop 6 works the usual easy Mac way and after a few clicks the software is available for use.
0 kommentar(er)
